IGCSE Chemistry June 2026 Grade Boundaries
What to Expect on the 18th of August 2026

TL;DR: Cambridge will not publish the June 2026 IGCSE Chemistry (0620) grade boundaries until results day on 18 August 2026 — any figure before then is an estimate, not a confirmed threshold. Boundaries are set after marking, once Cambridge has seen how the whole cohort performed. The clearest signal this session is the gap between the two Extended variants: Variant 1 looked predictable, while Variant 2 left a lot of students struggling. On five years of our own threshold data, that points to a Variant 1 A* in the low 170s and a Variant 2 A* noticeably lower — but these stay rough estimates until the real numbers land. The table further down shows 2021–2025 so you can judge the range for yourself.
When will the June 2026 IGCSE Chemistry (0620) grade boundaries be published?
The June 2026 IGCSE Chemistry grade boundaries are published on results day, 18 August 2026 — not before. Cambridge releases the threshold figures on the same day as results, usually within an hour or two of grades going live, and schools often see them a little earlier than candidates.
Until then, the only honest answer to "what are the boundaries?" is that they do not exist yet. They are decided after every script has been marked, so no tutor, forum or Telegram channel can hand you a real 2026 figure in advance. Anything circulating now is either last year's table or a guess.
When the day comes, the figures appear on the official Cambridge grade threshold tables for the June 2026 series, listed by syllabus and variant. That is the page to bookmark, and the only one worth trusting over a screenshot.
What are the June 2026 IGCSE Chemistry grade boundaries likely to be?
Nobody can state them in advance, because thresholds are set after marking once Cambridge sees the full cohort's performance. Based on our 2021–2025 data and the June 2026 papers, a Variant 1 A* is likely to land in the low 170s and a Variant 2 A* materially lower — but treat both as rough estimates, not predictions.
Here is what the last five June series required, out of 200 marks, across the two Extended variants. This is the most useful thing to anchor on, because it shows the real range rather than a single number.
| Year | Variant (Option) | A* | A | B | C |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Variant 1 (CX) | 142 | 117 | 92 | 67 |
| 2021 | Variant 2 (CY) | 145 | 118 | 91 | 64 |
| 2022 | Variant 1 (CX) | 159 | 130 | 101 | 72 |
| 2022 | Variant 2 (CY) | 145 | 118 | 91 | 65 |
| 2023 | Variant 1 (CX) | 161 | 131 | 101 | 72 |
| 2023 | Variant 2 (CY) | 157 | 128 | 99 | 70 |
| 2024 | Variant 1 (CX) | 167 | 137 | 107 | 78 |
| 2024 | Variant 2 (CY) | 170 | 141 | 110 | 79 |
| 2025 | Variant 1 (CX) | 172 | 145 | 116 | 88 |
| 2025 | Variant 2 (CY) | 173 | 146 | 117 | 89 |
The story this June is really two stories. Out of the three sciences, Chemistry was the calmest, and the main issue was that the two Extended variants behaved completely differently. Variant 1 was predictable — both Paper 4 and Paper 2 looked very similar to recent years in topic spread and format. Variant 2 was the opposite, with a great many students complaining that it was far harder than they had prepared for.
That kind of split tends to push the two variant thresholds well apart, which is normal and has happened before. Back in 2014 there was a roughly 14-mark gap between the variants in one session, and from what students are reporting, the June 2026 gap could be even wider. On the historical pattern, that points to a Variant 1 A* somewhere in the early 170s and a Variant 2 A* nearer 155–160.
Those figures are estimates and nothing more. If you have just sat the paper and have a clear sense of how it went, that is useful data — drop me a note on WhatsApp at +965 5137 5709 or email admin@chem-bio.info and tell me what you expect, because the cohort's own read is part of how the picture firms up before August. For the full component-level breakdown of Papers 2, 4 and 6, see our complete IGCSE Chemistry grade boundary guide.
Why do IGCSE Chemistry boundaries swing more than the other sciences?
Chemistry boundaries move more than Biology because the subject blends factual recall with multi-step calculation, so the difficulty of a paper can vary sharply — between sessions, and even between the two variants of the same session. A run of demanding stoichiometry or unfamiliar phrasing can lower the cohort's raw-mark average in a way that descriptive Biology answers rarely do.
That is exactly why a five-year table is more honest than a single predicted number. The A* threshold has climbed steadily as preparation has sharpened, but the year-on-year step is not fixed, and a single awkward paper can interrupt the trend.
Paper 4 is where most of that variance lives, because its calculations reward correct method as much as the final answer, and a wrong first step can cost a whole chain of marks. Our IGCSE Chemistry notes eBook drills the calculation routines that protect those method marks under time pressure.
Did the difficult June 2026 Paper 42 change the boundary outlook?
A paper that skips heavily drilled, high-yield topics lowers the cohort's average raw mark, which usually pulls the threshold down to keep the grade standard fair. The June 2026 Variant 2 theory paper did exactly that.
This session's Variant 2 featured very few electrolysis questions and noticeably less organic chemistry than usual — two areas most candidates revise hard and expect to score on. When the marks students bank on do not appear, the raw-mark distribution shifts down, and the awarding process responds by lowering the threshold so that a candidate who performed as well as last year's A* student still earns an A*.
That is the mechanism behind the wide Variant 1 to Variant 2 gap forecast above: not that Variant 2 students are weaker, but that they met a paper that suppressed the marks they had trained for.
Which variant did Gulf and Egypt students sit in June 2026 — and does the variant change the boundary?
Cambridge assigns variants by administrative zone and timetable, not by student or school preference. In the June 2026 session, the Middle East centres that went ahead — including Saudi Arabia and Egypt — sat Variant 1, while several countries in the region, among them the UAE, Bahrain, Kuwait and Lebanon, did not have sittings this series.
This matters because the two variants are graded on separate thresholds. If you sat Variant 1 in Saudi Arabia or Egypt, the predictable-paper picture and the low-170s A* estimate are the ones that apply to you. Variant 2 was sat across other zones worldwide, and it is those candidates who met the tougher theory paper and should be planning around a lower A* mark.
So when you read any forecast, the first question is always which variant you sat. A number that is reassuring for one variant can be misleading for the other.
Did the 2026 leak rumours or regional disruptions affect grade boundaries?
Rumoured leaks do not inflate the global boundary. Cambridge sets thresholds on actual cohort performance and investigates anomalous centres individually, stepping in only when a problem is serious and unmistakable rather than punishing every candidate over unverified screenshots.
When a paper really is compromised, the boards do act. In the June 2026 session one Biology multiple-choice paper was withdrawn and its marks redistributed across the remaining components — a rare, serious-case intervention. Chemistry, by contrast, ran normally and was the least controversial of the three sciences this year, so there is no reason to expect any leak-driven distortion of the 0620 thresholds.
The practical takeaway is to ignore the panic and watch the only thing that moves the boundary: how the cohort performed on the paper that was sat.
What A* raw mark should I target for June 2026 Chemistry?
Aim a few marks above the recent peak to build a buffer. For Variant 1, treat the low-to-mid 170s out of 200 as your working A* target; for Variant 2, plan around the upper 150s to low 160s, then push higher so a single dropped method mark never decides your grade.
A buffer matters because you cannot know the exact threshold while you revise, and because being one or two marks short of a boundary is the most avoidable way to miss a grade. Building in headroom turns a borderline script into a secure one.
The fastest way to bank that headroom is targeted past-paper work: sit full Paper 4 papers to time, then mark against the scheme to find where method marks leak. Our classified IGCSE Chemistry solved past papers sort questions by topic so you can attack electrolysis, stoichiometry and organic chemistry in focused blocks, and the IGCSE Chemistry course walks through the mark-scheme technique behind each one.
Frequently asked questions
What is the difference between a grade threshold and a grade boundary? They are the same thing under two names — Cambridge says "grade threshold," while AQA and Edexcel say "grade boundary." Both mean the minimum raw mark needed for a particular grade in that specific exam series.
My mark is one off the A* boundary — can I get a remark? Ask your exams officer about an Enquiry About Results, which can include a clerical check or a full remark. If you are within two or three marks of the next grade it is often worth requesting, since a single mark can change the outcome.
Are the March 2026 (India) boundaries the same as June 2026? No. Every series sets its own thresholds, so the March, June and November tables are all separate, even within the same calendar year.
Do Core and Extended have different boundaries? Yes. Core (Papers 1 and 3) and Extended (Papers 2 and 4) are separate routes with their own thresholds and grade ranges, so never compare a Core mark against an Extended boundary.
SEO title tag: IGCSE Chemistry June 2026 Grade Boundaries: 0620 Forecast
Feature-image prompt: A clean editorial illustration of a Cambridge IGCSE Chemistry answer script beside a line graph of grade thresholds that rises then splits into two diverging lines labelled Variant 1 and Variant 2; flat vector style, confident teal and warm amber on an off-white ground, a faint periodic-table motif in the background, generous negative space for a headline, 16:9. Avoid stock-photo beakers and generic posed students.














